Advertisements

Donald Trump Shut Down The Migrant Caravan With One Tweet

Advertisements

This Picture From Barack Obama’s Past Just Ruined His Life For Good

This-Picture-From-Barack-Obamas-Past-Just-Ruined-His-Life-For-Good-1024x683

Journalists pounced on the terrible tragedy at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh to attack Donald Trump.

Their main concern was blaming him for the shooting to hurt him in the election.

But then an old picture of Barack Obama resurfaced and it just changed everything.

Media Falsely Blames Donald Trump For Synagogue Shooting

Republicans built a cloud of steam going into the final days before the midterm election.

Polls showed GOP candidates surging and in the position to boot multiple Democrat Senators from office.

So the media sprung into action to try and save their Democrat allies.

Journalists settled on the narrative that Donald Trump bore the responsibility of an anti-Semitic bigot murdering 11 innocent worshippers.

The Washington Post’s Philip Bump said that Trump was to blame for creating the environment that led to this act of evil.

He wrote:

“A CENTRAL QUESTION ABOUT THE ATTEMPTED BOMBINGS AND THE SYNAGOGUE SHOOTING IS: WHY NOW? IS IT A COINCIDENCE THAT BOTH OF THOSE ACTS HAPPENED AT THIS MOMENT? OR WAS THE BOMBER, ALLEGEDLY SAYOC, REACTING IN PART TO THE ASSERTION THAT DEMOCRATS WERE BEING VIOLENT? WAS THE SYNAGOGUE SHOOTER, ALLEGEDLY BOWERS, REACTING TO THE INCREASED URGENCY FOMENTED BY TRUMP AND HIS ALLIES ABOUT THE RISK OF MIGRANTS COMING TO THE UNITED STATES?”

Bump then answered his own question.

He also wrote:

“SO WE HAVE TO NOTE WHY THAT RHETORIC EXISTS: BECAUSE TRUMP AND HIS ALLIES THINK THAT CONCERN ABOUT MIGRANTS AND ABOUT DEMOCRATIC VIOLENCE WILL HELP THEM WIN ELECTIONS, WHETHER OR NOT THEY THINK THOSE CONCERNS ARE VALID.”

Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders shut down this fake news.

She noted that while Trump was condemning the people who committed acts of terrorism, the media was busy attacking Trump.

“The very first action the president did was condemn these heinous acts. The very first thing that the media did was condemn the president,” she declared.

An Old Photo Of Barack Obama Resurfaces

Things went from bad to worse for the media.

After they rushed to blame Trump for the shooting, critics noted they gave the Democrats a pass for mainstreaming anti-Semitism.

In 2005, a smiling Barack Obama was photographed standing next to the openly racist and anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.

But Barack Obama is not the only prominent Democrat who wrapped his arms around Farrakhan.

Bill Clinton sat front-and-center with the notorious anti-Semite at Aretha Franklin’s funeral.

Sean Davis

@seanmdav

If you’re wondering why media have suddenly characterized all criticism of George Soros as “anti-Semitism” (it’s not), it’s because they’re desperate to avoid discussing the fact that Democrats have actively encouraged the most vile out-and-proud anti-Semites for years.

Democrats Have A Louis Farrakhan Problem     

The left has a Louis Farrakhan problem.

Shortly before the shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue, Farrakhan tweeted out a video where he compared Jews to termites.

Twitter did not ban him.

The left sat silently as Farrakhan spread his hate-filled, anti-Semitic poison over social media.

If any group is responsible for condoning anti-Semitism, it is the American left.

They refuse to expel Farrakhan from polite society.

Therefore, they have allowed him to mainstream his hatred.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Obama Used Three Words To Attack Trump That Every Democrat Instantly Regretted

Rush Limbaugh Revealed A Secret About The Mail Bombs That Had Everyone Talking

Rush-Limbaugh-Revealed-A-Secret-About-The-Mail-Bombs-That-Had-Everyone-Talking-1024x671

Democrats and the fake news media pounced on the suspicious packages mailed to the Democrats and CNN.

They seized on the mail bombs to claim the American people must reject Donald Trump in November.

But Rush Limbaugh revealed a secret about the bombs that had everyone talking.

Rush Limbaugh Reveals The Media’s Real Plan

On a recent broadcast, Limbaugh discussed the mail bombs and how the media made use of them.

Limbaugh noted that the bombs were supposed to look crude – like they were made by a Trump supporter who lives out in the woods.

But none of the bombs exploded.

To Limbaugh, that meant they were specifically designed to look basic.

He believes an expert was behind the bombs.

Limbaugh began, “It takes some expertise here to manufacture bombs like this. If it’s true that they’re not intended to go off, and if it’s true that they’re meant to look crude and made by people that starred in the movie Deliverance, it takes bomb-making skill to put together bombs like that. I mean, these bombs, mail bombs have timers on ’em. Folks, there… A mail bomb, any bomb expert knows you don’t put a timer on a mail bomb. A mail bomb is designed to go off when it’s opened. You put a timer on there strictly for visual effect because every bomb on TV has a timer.”

“Remember, we are a TV society. What we see on TV we tend to believe. Therefore bombs are featured in many TV shows and movies. And every bomb has a countdown timer on it. So these do too. Except they’re not active. They’re not turned on. They’re not counting down. And they’re not connected to anything. They’re just there for show. The stamps have not been canceled. I mean, as though they would have progressed through some sort of standard procedure at the post office,” he continued.

The Truth About The Bombs Raises New Questions

None of the bombs exploded.

Tom Winter of NBC News reported this was because they were not made to explode.

He tweeted:

NBC News: Law enforcement sources say that at this point in the review of the bombs it is clear that some were incapable of exploding. Whether that was a design flaw or intentional is not yet known. Analysis is ongoing

They say to treat any suspicious package as if it were real.

This backed up earlier reporting by former Fox News reporter Adam Housley who said his law enforcement sources told him the bombs were “hoaxes.”

This raises serious questions about the intent and motivation of the bomber.

Rush Limbaugh Asks One Final Question

Limbaugh asked another question about the media coverage of the bombs.

He said he heard “drive-by” journalists claiming this story was depressing Republican voter enthusiasm.

But no pollsters ran any surveys.

Limbaugh claimed this was just wish-fulfillment on their part.

If all the fake news journalists went on TV and said Republican voters were disgusted by Trump inciting these bombs, then no one would show up and vote.

You have to view everything the fake news media says in terms of how it helps Democrats win elections.

If you understand that, you understand the psychology behind how the media frames and covers stories.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Chelsea Clinton Made An Announcement That Could Change Everything In 2020

Capture

Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have run for President.

While Bill won, Hillary made a fool of herself for the whole world to see.

Now Chelsea may be giving it a try as well after making an announcement that could change everything in 2020.

Chelsea Clinton Politically
Chelsea Clinton has the same politics as her parents.

She is a liberal who hates conservative Americans.

Since her mother lost the presidency, she has been vocally opposed to President Trump.

And she’s vocally in favor of policies like abortion.

She even went so far as to say that anybody who is pro-life isn’t a true Christian.

Oftentimes her statements seem like something a politician would say.

This isn’t surprising considering who her parents are.

But it has already created questions about her own political ambitions.

She has spent her whole life in the political arena.

And she finally made a statement on a potential run for office.

Chelsea Answers The Question
In an interview, the question of Chelsea running for office came up.

Chelsea responded, saying:

“I THINK IF SOMEONE WERE TO STEP DOWN OR RETIRE AND I THOUGHT I COULD DO A GOOD JOB AND IT MATCHED MY TALENTS, I’D HAVE TO THINK IF IT’S THE RIGHT CHOICE FOR ME.”

Her answer leaves a lot of openings.

It means that when 2020 comes along, she probably won’t try to challenge Trump.

But she may try to pick up a seat somewhere else.

If she does end up in any elected office, she is sure to be just as corrupt and liberal as her parents.

She knows nothing else.

Chelsea has spent her entire life surrounded by the world’s elites.

You can be sure she won’t disappoint them if elected to public office.

If Not 2020, Could It Be Later?
But not running for President in 2020 doesn’t mean she won’t try at some point down the road.

However, if she were to run, her parents would serve as a double-edged sword.

They have a lot of influence and can help her get in touch with the world’s elites.

So raising money and getting her name out there won’t be hard.

But her parents are also highly disliked by many.

Her father had to be impeached.

And her mother lost the presidency to Donald Trump.

That means those on the left hate her for not defeating him.

And those on the right hate her because Trump exposed her as a corrupt leftist.

Chelsea will have to deal with that if she decides to run at any level.

And she will also have to accept the fact that everybody knows she is only where she is because of her parents.

There’s no indication that Chelsea is anything extraordinary.

Her only major accomplishment outside of being birthed by Hillary Clinton is writing a book that very few have read.

Do you think Chelsea Clinton could win the presidency?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

%d bloggers like this: